Skip to main content

Common questions on climate change

1.  Are renewable energy systems even viable or are they just an Utopian dream of impractical scientists? And even if they are viable wouldn’t it cost an arm and a leg to make them viable?


Among the multitude of scientific journal articles, which answers both these questions separately, one article answers both these questions succinctly in a single paper.


In 2011 Jacobson et al. proposed a 100% WWS (wind, water, solar) energy system which can supplant the current fossil fuel industry. They found that production cost of WWS is exactly same as current fossil fuel-derived energy systems and that includes costs of production, storing, and transmission (with transmission losses). Their conclusion is that “ … barriers to a 100% conversion to WWS power worldwide are primarily social and political, not technological or even economic.”


2. Which countries invest the most in renewables?


The current standing (May, 2017) is:


3. What is geothermal energy?


Geothermal Energy is a viable a source of renewable energy. A NatGeo documentary Steam Drilling (2012) explores the steamy world of geothermal energy production, its challenges, and its tremendous potential as a renewable energy source.


The only problem with geothermal energy is its location dependence. Only a few places on Earth are fortunate enough to have access to geothermal energy reserves. Krafla Power Station in Iceland is one such place. Till now it remains unique in its production of geothermal energy.


4. Many liberals claim that 97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real and that it is man-made while conservatives say that it is a made-up number and the actual consensus is much lower. Who is right and where did this number come from?

The 97% comes from a series of surveys and meta-analysis done by climate scientists on the level of consensus in their own community. See this short video to get a quick update on how the number is arrived at or read the article at skepticalscience. However, the most convincing argument always come from a paper published in a reputed a peer-reviewed journal.  And that argument can be found in the recent article by Cook J et al 2016 Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming Environ. Res. Lett. 11 048002 IOPscience.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fastest way to send multiple drafts from gmail

People claim that the fastest way to send multiple email drafts is to use Gmail IMAP with email client like Outlook or Evolution or Thunderbird. But I have found this is not true. Because Thunderbird and Evolution etc. email clients treats the drafts as emails still to be edited. So it is not just simple select all and hit send. Each email draft has to be opened and sent separately. That is a lot of clicks and mouse movements, wasting precious time and energy. I have a better solution which involves minimum keystrokes and mouse usage. Efficiency booster technique for sending emails. If someone is feeling adventurous and want to try it from the Gmail interface itself, here's how to do it in the fastest possible manner. It involves using the mouse once. Select the first draft. Gmail would open a new email box and put the cursor inside the box to write. Press TAB once to go the Send button. Press ENTER to send. Now Gmail sends it and the box is gone but the highlight goes to the last

LYRICS OF CHANDRABINDOO

___________________________________________________________________ SWEET HEART FROM AAR JAANI NAA(T-SERIES) -- SWEETHEART -- Pratham college-er din ta Aajo thik e mone poRey scene ta Dada didi haath dhorey siNRi tei bose poRey Aamar chokh ta ghorey bon bon bon bon Sweetheart, I am seating alone Sweetheart, for me there is none DhoNk gile chole gelo pratham maas Meye dekhlei feli deergho-shwash DhoNk gile chole gelo pratham maas Meye dekhlei othe nabhishwash Meyera bheeshan smart poRey chhoto mini-skirt Aamar e je sheet korey kon kon kon kon Sweetheart, I am seating alone Sweetheart, for me there is none Taarporey kete gelo maas chaar Fuse holo je kato future Bandhura purse khule eke oke taake tole Aamar pran ta korey chon mon chon mon Sweetheart, I am seating alone Sweetheart, for me there is none Ekdin lawn theke beriye Ek tanayaar dike taakiye Hawt korey ki je holo magaj ta ghurey gelo Taar kaaner saamne kori ghyan ghyan ghyan ghyan Sweetheart, I am seating alone Sweethea

Changing the font size of section headings in LaTex

You have several ways to do so: 1.- A direct redefinition of \section: \makeatletter \renewcommand\section{\@startsection{section}{1}{\z@}%                                   {-3.5ex \@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%                                   {2.3ex \@plus.2ex}%                                   {\normalfont\large\bfseries}} \makeatother 2.- By means of the titlesec package: \usepackage{titlesec} \titleformat{\section}{\large\bfseries}{\thesection}{1em}{} 3.- By means of the sectsty package: \usepackage{sectsty} \sectionfont{\large} source : http://www.latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3245   Now, I would explain the titlesec package a bit more (because it seems easier to me and with more options) : To change the section fonts with this package put the following lines in the preamble - \usepackage{titlesec} \titleformat{\ section }{\ large \ bfseries }{\thesection}{1em}{} Options available are- a> Font size - \normals